Saturday, November 16, 2013

LIT 365: Literature and Film

...................................................................................................................................................................................
Make-up class notice:

December 13, 2013 (Friday)
Time: 3:00 pm - 4:20 pm
........................................................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................................................
Final Exam Syllabus:

"The Stepford Wives" by Frank Oz


"The Exorcist" by William Friedkin          


"Dracula" by  Tod Browning and Karl Freund                                   
........................................................................................................................................................................................

Dracula (Novel)

http://www.planetpdf.com/planetpdf/pdfs/free_ebooks/Dracula_T.pdf

Dracula (Movie)


Please follow the links given below for critical readings of Dracula:

Bram Stoker's Dracula: A Reflection and Rebuke of Victorian Society







Thursday, November 7, 2013

PHI 301: Engineering Ethics

PHI 301: Engineering Ethics

Course outline

...................................................................................................................................................................................
Make-up Exam Notice:

1st Midterm
Saturday, December 14, 2013 @ 12 pm at Gulshan campus
........................................................................................................................................................................................




PHI 301: Engineering Ethics

Lecture Sheet 15: Employer Rights

Instructor: M. Jamal Hossain

Employer Rights:

You become an employer as soon as you appoint even one employee. The American federal employment laws have certain rights and responsibilities that govern the way an employer-employee relationship should function. As an employer, it is very important that you understand your rights as well as your responsibilities towards your employees so that you can avoid unnecessary situations at your workplace and can also protect yourself in case one ever arises.
Employers need to know various rules that direct their workings with employees and also their own rights. These can be broadly classified as:
Appointing Employees:
  • When hiring any employee, it is important that the employer does not discriminate against any applicant based on his sex, nationality, religion, race, etc.
  • The employer does have the right to refuse someone a job if they do not feel the person would be appropriate for the position, provided there are no prejudices involved.
  • An employer also has the right to not hire someone who is using any drugs, but it has to be a current addiction and not any past problem that has been overcome.
  • An employer cannot refuse someone a job because they are disabled, but if the disability interferes with job performance, then the employer is within his rights to reject such job applications.
Salaries and Wages:
  • All employers are required to pay at least minimum wages to their employees. But if their employees regularly receive a minimum of $30 in tips every month, then an employer can pay the worker as little as $2.13 per hour.
  • Employers are within their rights in not paying overtime to employees in an executive or managerial level position. Such employees should have at least one or two subordinates working under them and also the right to hire and fire such subordinates. But if the management position is just a fancy title and not an actual position, then the employer has to pay overtime.
  • Employees do not have to be paid for time spent in commuting to work, unless such travel is outside the scope of the daily work commute.
Discrimination at Work:
  • An employer cannot discriminate against any person based on his religion, sex, race, nationality, and age.
  • Employers need not hire anyone who is not suitable for the job and this does not constitute discrimination.
  • Employers do not have the right to fire someone for complaining about discrimination.
Leave Policies:
  • Employers have the right to refuse paid vacation or sick leave to employees. But employers who do choose to give some paid time off to their workers should ensure that all their workers get the same benefits, otherwise it can be termed as discrimination.
  • Employers need not give paid maternity leave to new mothers, but if they do, then they have to provide the same to new fathers also. But they are required to give unpaid parental leave of up to 12 weeks in the first year of the newborn.
  • To check that an employee does have a medical condition, employers can ask their employees who ask for sick leave to provide a doctor’s certificate.
Firing Employees:
  • An employer can fire an employee for any reason (provided it is not illegal) if there is no employment contract. Where such a contract does exist, the rules for firing are governed by the contract.
  • A fired employee does not need to be given a severance package, but if it was promised in their contract, then it has to be given.
  • An employer is not required to give a positive reference to a fired employee, but on the other hand employers cannot even unnecessarily badmouth the employee or else they face a defamation lawsuit.
These are the things that any employer should be aware of when employing a worker. If under any circumstances, an employer does face any legal charges brought forth by an employee, then they should take these charges seriously and get a qualified lawyer to help them with their situation.


PHI 301: Engineering Ethics

Lecture Sheet 14: Science Technology and the Future
Instructor: Md. Jamal Hossain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Research on active biomaterials for implantation in the human body could lead to in-situ repair and regeneration of damaged tissue as an alternative to surgery and a cure for some diseases.
Advances in the next 3 to 10 years are expected to make DNA microarray technology ever more widely accessible, reaching a commercial scale that promises to speed the discovery of new biomedical applications in the next several decades.
Mathematical modeling and analysis of large data sets promise to enable application of knowledge obtained from explorations of the human genome to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease.
A wide range of technologies, from pharmaceuticals to implantable devices, and specialised cognitive or behavioural training (leading to regional brain activation through functional imaging), will enable extensions of human bodies, senses, and capabilities. This will lead to redefinition of various boundaries: natural versus artificial, alive versus dead, individual versus collective.
Multidisciplinary efforts by astrobiologists are expected to increase our understanding of the origins of life on this planet and could result in finding biospheres beyond Earth.
Completion of the 2010 Project to understand the function of all genes in a model plant is expected to support the development of crops, plants of industrial usefulness, and medicinal plants.
Nanoshells could revolutionise oncology by enabling precisely targeted therapies that could replace chemotherapy and radiation.
Interaction between personal electronic products, mediated by human skin, may lead to new, and greater use of, invasive applications.
Chemical-based drug development is likely to be displaced by methods based on biotechnology, promising to make possible individualized drug formulas that are more efficacious than 'blockbuster drugs' in the treatment of disease.
The first practical biochemical nanocomputing devices are probably a decade or more away, but their development is being fueled by massive investment in research in the genomic sciences and nanotechnologies.
Drugs for non-clinical conditions promise to be used widely by select population segments as forms of self-medication to optimise performance.
Biological research is stimulating work in new realms of mathematics, and new maths is contributing to advances in biology. Growing synergy between the two disciplines promises to accelerate progress in both fields in coming decades.
The field of bioinformatics may grow over the next two decades, but not fast enough to meet increasing demand for bioinformatics expertise from pharmaceutical and other biochemical industries.
The next 20 years are likely to witness a revolution in our understanding of the human brain, with implications for virtually every domain of human activity, from mental health to software design and academic performance and real-life decision- making.
Advances in technology and medicine, as well as the expiration of patents on medicine, will open up wider opportunities in health care in developing regions.
Two new types of 'intelligent' polymers may be a source of design innovation over the coming decade, especially in the biomedical field. Mass commercial applications may follow.
In tandem with the development of inexpensive tools to sequence the genome of various species, the merger of evolutionary and developmental biology will enable us to study evolutionary variation in a methodical way, learning how organisms evolve and change their form. Evo-devo could enable us to develop medical interventions to prevent birth defects and heriditary diseases. Ultimately, evo-devo could enable us to construct organisms from their component genetic data.
Testing of DNA with nanowire sensors is likely to replace traditional DNA tests, making such testing less expensive, faster, and more widely available as a diagnostic tool.
The ability to rapidly genotype plants is expected to contribute to improvements in human and ecoystem health in the next decade.
Promising research is expected to lead to vastly improved detection and treatment of cancer within the next 10 years.
The tools of computational biology may be applied at an increasing rate to pharmaceutical innovation in the next 20 to 50 years, resulting in a faster, less costly, and more tailored approach to drug development.
Stretching the realm of possibilities, biological physicists and engineers are treating cells as tools that can be mechanically reworked for environmental and biomedical purposes. Expect new applications in the next 10 to 20 years but also intense debate about unintended consequences.
Smart materials -- a variety of materials engineered for special qualities and capable of interacting with the larger environment -- are likely to proliferate in the coming decades, serving purposes from protecting and healing us to saving energy.
Stem cell research is likely to lead to a new kind of cell-based medicine that regenerates the body, but practical and ethical challenges mean safe and effective treatments may be decades away.
New discoveries by cell biologists regarding the role of RNA in gene regulation have provided researchers with a powerful tool that will likely have wide-ranging impact. These discoveries have also spurred the formation of biotechnology companies aiming to develop RNA-based therapies.

Chemistry
The unique properties of conductive polymers are likely to find application in a wide variety of electronic devices within the next couple of decades.
Two new types of 'intelligent' polymers may be a source of design innovation over the coming decade, especially in the biomedical field. Mass commercial applications may follow.
Nanomanipulation at the quantum level of chemical reactions could ameliorate chemical pollution.
As students who learn in ‘green’ laboratories apply their knowledge in industry, environmentally responsible practices for the design, manufacture, and disposal of chemicals may replace unsustainable practices.
Computer Sciences
Developments in display technology may increase the repertoire of interactions between users and digital media by increasing the number of sites for ‘ambient’ displays.
As metropolitan roadways become more congested and growth of road capacity is curtailed by lack of suitable land and by NIMBYism, automated highway systems may be employed to increase capacity and safety.
A nearly ubiquitous broadband architecture of wireless services for users of electronic telecommunications devices promises to be available globally by 2015.
Interested amateurs are likely to have increased opportunities in the future to donate resources, time, or labor in support of scientific research, thanks largely to low-cost distributed computing.
Interaction between personal electronic products, mediated by human skin, may lead to new, and greater use of, invasive applications.
The first practical biochemical nanocomputing devices are probably a decade or more away, but their development is being fueled by massive investment in research in the genomic sciences and nanotechnologies.
The concept of cyberspace as a distinct geographical entity has influenced the way we think about information technology, e-commerce, copyright, and high-tech products. New technologies are revealing a more complex relation between data-space and the real world, with consequences in all these areas.
The first physical neural interface between a computer and a human brain (probably serving a prosthetic function) may be demonstrated by 2015–2020.
Simulations that take advantage of vastly increased computing power could be used more heavily in the social sciences, eventually becoming the more dominant means of analysis as a method of predicting human behaviour.
The field of bioinformatics may grow over the next two decades, but not fast enough to meet increasing demand for bioinformatics expertise from pharmaceutical and other biochemical industries.
Solution of the seven maths problems named by the Clay Mathematics Institute as its Millennium Prize Problems may blur the line between 'pure' and 'applied' mathematics and could also have implications for computer and network architectures and security.
Nanoscale physical materials that can be automatically assembled into useful configurations by computer instructions could usher in a new era in manufacturing.
Parallel programming -- programming for hundreds or thousands of concurrent independent processes or 'threads' – may become increasingly important over the next decade as the result of developments in both hardware and software. Programming for small scale mobile and embedded devices may be an exception to this trend.
New technologies for cooperation and a better understanding of cooperative strategies may create a new capacity for rapid, ad hoc, and distributed decision making.
The tools of computational biology may be applied at an increasing rate to pharmaceutical innovation in the next 20 to 50 years, resulting in a faster, less costly, and more tailored approach to drug development.
Working prototypes of quantum computers may be demonstrated by 2040, making a whole new range of computationally intensive tasks possible.
Proactive and context-aware computer systems that anticipate users' needs and perform tasks in a timely and context-sensitive manner may begin to have an impact within the next 10 years.
New applications for supercomputing may develop over the next decade as large-scale supercomputing services become accessible over broadband terrestrial and wireless Internet networks by 2015.
Tiny processors and Web servers, some as small as specks of dust, with increasing capacities for data storage, may be widely embedded in the environment and in physical objects by 2015.
RFID tagging systems will probably be widely used to identify and track physical objects in a variety of industrial and consumer settings by 2015, despite concerns about potential abuse.
Nanoscale processors are likely to be widely adopted for general computing in most parts of the world by the middle of the century.
Nanotechnology
Developments in nanotechnology are expected to affect almost every route by which drugs are delivered into the human body, with improvements ranging from incremental to revolutionary.
Carbon nanotube composites promise to enable the creation of lighter and stronger transportation vehicles.
Nanoshells promise to revolutionise oncology by enabling precisely targeted therapies that could replace chemotherapy and radiation.
The Dream of Biochemical Nanocomputing The first practical biochemical nanocomputing devices are probably a decade or more away, but their development is being fueled by massive investment in research in the genomic sciences and nanotechnologies.
Nanoscale physical materials that can be automatically assembled into useful configurations by computer instructions could usher in a new era in manufacturing.
Smaller, cheaper, more accurate sensors engineered on the nanoscale promise to provide unprecedented access to information about the physical world.
As growing populations exhaust the ability of natural sources to supply fresh water, new nanotechnologies for purification of waste streams and desalinisation of ocean water could fill the gap.
Testing of DNA with nanowire sensors is likely to replace traditional DNA tests, making such testing less expensive, faster, and more widely available as a diagnostic tool.
Nanoscale wires under development today promise to make electronic circuits faster, more powerful, lighter, and cooler, and provide a very efficient method for transmitting electricity.
Smart materials -- a variety of materials engineered for special qualities and capable of interacting with the larger environment -- are likely to proliferate in the coming decades, serving purposes from protecting and helping us to saving energy.
Nanoscale processors are likely to be widely adopted for general computing in most parts of the world by the middle of the century.

Ecology and Earth Science
The ongoing process of identifying all living species and determining their interdependencies, range, life cycle, and population size will one day be completed, possibly in the next 50 years.
Greater access to computing resources may allow complex ecosystem modelling to reach a level of detail that could inform a significant improvement in our stewardship of the planet and its resources.
Advances in several different technologies could improve the accuracy of forecasting of local and regional weather.
As growing populations exhaust the ability of natural sources to supply fresh water, new nanotechnologies for purification of waste streams and desalinisation of ocean water could fill the gap.
Nanomanipulation at the quantum level of chemical reactions could ameliorate chemical pollution.
Widely distributed sensor networks that will increase the amount and quality of data available to modellers may open new avenues of research in seismology.
As technologies to mitigate the climate change that now seems inevitable are developed, their availability will probably vary widely across regions and nations. The developed world will likely be capable of dealing with localized impacts in the next 50 years, while the developing world will struggle to cope with widespread challenges.

Energy
Despite current high oil prices and concerns about supplies beyond the 2040s, there may be plenty of oil to meet the world’s energy needs for the next century.
Technologies such as coal gasification may be employed around the globe to provide the second wave of ‘clean’ fossil fuel energy as countries turn to their own coal deposits to meet growing energy needs.
Energy consumption may continue to increase worldwide, with a heavy continued reliance on fossil fuels to meet the growing need.
Biofuels are unlikely to become more than a marginal source of energy, but research in the area may help drive breakthroughs in other areas such as energy storage.
A variety of parallel advances in materials and miniaturisation may provide more options for powering electrical equipment independently of national grids.
Consumers in industrialised nations may start a small but significant movement by demanding increasing energy efficiency.
If construction of LNG transportation infrastructure accelerates along with demand, natural gas could, within the next 50 years, join oil as the second essential energy commodity.
Fusion could be the answer to the world's energy needs. ITER, a $5bn experimental reactor will come on-line in about a decade but success is not guaranteed.
The moon's rich mineral deposits and other natural resources could one day be mined to fuel space exploration throughout our solar system and provide energy for Earth.
Despite its potential to cut fossil-fuel dependency, global use of nuclear power will probably experience only modest growth over the next two decades, driven mainly by developing economies.
Although the 'hydrogen economy' is decades away, hydrogen-based fuel cells may be increasingly applied in niche areas.
Estimates of how much oil the world has left vary, as do scenarios for phasing out its use. One thing is certain: as a fossil fuel, oil is a finite resource and its end will come, sooner or later, planned for or not.
Solar is the wild card of all energy sources, offering the potential to meet most of our energy needs once technological breakthroughs make the cost competitive.
Price spikes and geopolitical concern over secure oil supplies could motivate increasing investment in synfuels production and building of a synfuels oligopoly by large energy companies.
Thanks to technological improvements, wind energy is likely to continue to be the fastest growing major energy source over the next several years, but it will probably not displace oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, or hydroelectric as a top energy producer for at least the next 20 years.

Materials
Research on active biomaterials for implantation in the human body could lead to in-situ repair and regeneration of damaged tissue as an alternative to surgery and a cure for some diseases.
Carbon nanotube composites promise to enable the creation of lighter and stronger transportation vehicles.
Nanoshells promise to revolutionise oncology by enabling precisely targeted therapies that could replace chemotherapy and radiation.
The unique properties of conductive polymers are likely to find application in a wide variety of electronic devices within the next couple of decades.
Ink-jet technology could give individuals the power to manufacture their own products. This idea has significant implications for high-tech customisation, developing countries' access to advanced technology, and for global economic competitiveness.
Two new types of 'intelligent' polymers may be a source of design innovation over the coming decade, especially in the biomedical field. Mass commercial applications may follow.
Nanoscale physical materials that can be automatically assembled into useful configurations by computer instructions could usher in a new era in manufacturing.
Nanoscale wires under development today promise to make electronic circuits faster, more powerful, lighter, and cooler, and provide a very efficient method for transmitting electricity.
Smaller, cheaper, more accurate sensors engineered on the nanoscale promise to provide unprecedented access to information about the physical world.
Smart materials -- a variety of materials engineered for special qualities and capable of interacting with the larger environment -- are likely to proliferate in the coming decades, serving purposes from protecting and healing us to saving energy.

Economics
As metropolitan roadways become more congested and growth of road capacity is curtailed by lack of suitable land and by NIMBYism, automated highway systems may be employed to increase capacity and safety.
The application of artificial intelligence to commerce may make trade and logistics more efficient.
Demographic changes from urbanisation, dropping fertility rates, and aging of the population may precipitate a re-examination of welfare economics.
Crisis and pragmatism could encourage more economists to account for ecological costs and to rethink the role of natural systems in understanding markets and growth.
Distributed and wireless technologies may precipitate innovative strategies for economic growth in poor countries enabling the rapid development of economic infrastructure.
Mobile phones have the potential to spur economic growth, especially entrepreneurial business, in the Developing World.
Advances in simulation tools and behavioural analysis may facilitate innovation in economic research methods.
New technologies for cooperation and a better understanding of cooperative strategies may create a new capacity for rapid, ad hoc, and distributed decision making.
The next wave of global trade will be driven by the off-shoring of services and information-processing tasks that can be delivered electronically.
A shift in R&D processes from “ivory tower” models to global networks of contractors and alliances could have a significant impact on the economics of innovation.

Mathematics
Mathematical modeling and analysis of large data sets promise to enable application of knowledge obtained from explorations of the human genome to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease.
Completion of the 2010 Project to understand the function of all genes in a model plant is expected to provide information applicable to plants of industrial usefulness, such as crop plants and medicinal plants.
Mathematical tools for discovering patterns in large databases, along with stochastic modeling, could contribute to better decision making in a range of fields.
Biological research is stimulating work in new realms of mathematics, and new maths is contributing to advances in biology. Growing synergy between the two disciplines promises to accelerate progress in both fields in coming decades.
Solution of the seven maths problems named by the Clay Mathematics Institute as its Millennium Prize Problems may blur the line between 'pure' and 'applied' mathematics and could also have implications for computer and network architectures and security.

Social Sciences
The advent of archaeology at the molecular level thanks to advancements in genetics, chemistry, and physics is expected to lead to a new level of precision in archeological research and enable better understanding of past events and cultures.
As sociologists incorporate the challenges of the 21st century into the discipline, new areas of research such as sociology of terrorism and sociology of war are expected to arise.
Complexity theory promises to become the dominant tool for managing social relations.
Social scientists are increasingly likely to incorporate a geographical perspective in their work as geocoded data becomes more available and methods of spatial analysis become more sophisticated.
Mobile phones have the potential to spur economic growth, especially entrepreneurial business, in the Developing World.
The rise of applied anthropology is likely to challenge the traditional structure of the discipline.
The rise of applied sociology is likely to challenge traditional divisions in sociology.
Simulations that take advantage of vastly increased computing power could be used more heavily in the social sciences, eventually becoming the more dominant means of analysis as a method of predicting human behaviour.
Cyber-ethnography, defined as the study of online interaction, is likely to become an important area of anthropological research as more and more human activites are conducted in cyberspace.

Space Sciences
Multidisciplinary efforts by astrobiologists are expected to increase our understanding of the origins of life on this planet and could result in finding biospheres beyond Earth.
The moon's rich mineral deposits and other natural resources could one day be mined to fuel space exploration throughout our solar system and provide energy for Earth.
Manned space missions may diminish in importance and number as developments in the design and deployment of robot spacecraft make them increasingly attractive to space agencies.
Within Earth's orbit, manned spaceflight may be driven by space tourism and Chinese nationalism. NASA's manned spaceflight endeavours will probably focus on its plans for a manned mission to the moon, but China may beat them to it.

Physics
Progress in quantum theory may make it more understandable and useful : a better understanding of foundational issues in physics may support developments in nanotechnology, quantum computing, superconducting materials and many other fields.
Experimental physicists may finally converge on a single underlying theory that describes all the fundamental workings of the universe, from subatomic particles ruled by quantum mechanics to the gravitational forces so elegantly explained by Einstein's general theory of relativity.
Progress is likely to be made in understanding the dominance of dark matter and dark energy in our universe.
Psychology
Developments in brain imaging will continue to provide new insights into relationships between brain and mind states, states, and into psychological processes that can be quantified objectively and used to provide other measures of brain output besides overt behaviour and inferences from psychology experiments.
The next 20 years are likely to witness a revolution in our understanding of the human brain, with implications for virtually every domain of human activity, from mental health to software design and academic performance and real-life decision- making.
A wide range of technologies, from pharmaceuticals to implantable devices, and specialised cognitive or behavioural training (leading to regional brain activation through functional imaging), will enable extensions of human bodies, senses, and capabilities. This will lead to redefinition of various boundaries: natural versus artificial, alive versus dead, individual versus collective.
Gene expression mapping could popularize evolutionary psychology, an approach to understanding human behaviour that combines evolutionary biology and cognitive science.

Geographic Science
Brazil could emerge as one of the world's leading scientific powers by 2025, if it pursues a policy of intelligent investment and maximises the benefits of international collaboration.
Brazilian technology has thus far developed a small number of world-class centres of excellence. In the next 20 years, overall domestic technological contributions to the national economy could expand, given the right conditions.
While existing science and technology centres continue to thrive, new regional innovation clusters are likely to develop in the emerging science powerhouses of China, India, and Brazil to maximise knowledge networks and economies of scale.
The 20th-century phenomenon of 'brain drain', of scientific and engineering talent emigrating from developing countries to North America and Europe, is likely to be replaced by 'brain circulation', in which globally mobile scientists and engineers work for shorter periods in a wider range of countries.
The 'science city', and the underlying model of state management and direction of science that it often implied, will probably become obsolete in the next 20 years, displaced by the new phenomenon of the science park.
Over the next 50 years, the long US dominance of a wide range of fields in science and technology is likely to end as the global scientific playing field becomes flatter and more diverse.
China could emerge as a scientific and technical superpower in the next 20 years if it improves its management of intellectual property and finance, further liberalises its markets, and relaxes political constraints.
Structure Science
Interested amateurs are likely to have increased opportunities in the future to donate resources, time, or labor in support of scientific research, thanks largely to low-cost distributed computing.
The 20th-century phenomenon of 'brain drain', of scientific and engineering talent emigrating from developing countries to North America and Europe, is likely to be replaced by 'brain circulation', in which globally mobile scientists and engineers work for shorter periods in a wider range of countries.
The 'science city', and the underlying model of state management and direction of science that it often implied, will probably become obsolete in the next 20 years, displaced by the new phenomenon of the science park.
Open access promises to replace the current scientific publishing establishment.
Smaller, lighter instruments promise to enable field scientists to conduct research in increasingly varied environments.
Complexity
The application of artificial intelligence to commerce may make trade and logistics more efficient.
Greater access to computing resources may allow complex ecosystem modelling to reach a level of detail that could inform a significant improvement in our stewardship of the planet and its resources.
Complexity theory may have a role in managing social relations.
Advances in simulation tools and behavioural analysis may facilitate innovation in economic research methods.
New technologies for cooperation and a better understanding of cooperative strategies may create a new capacity for rapid, ad hoc, and distributed decision making.

PHI 301: Engineering Ethics
Lecture Sheet 13: The Rights of Engineers
Instructor: M. Jamal Hossain
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rights of Engineers
The profession of engineering proclaims this universal declaration of engineers’ rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and nations, to the end that every individual and every entity of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, corporate, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of every country themselves and among the management, employers, staffs and peoples engaged by corporations and other employers under their jurisdictions. Further, all persons, by virtue of practicing as an engineer and exercising the duties and responsibilities which go with such a professional position in employment, has certain rights when engaged in an engineer employee capacity, as delineated herein:
 
Article 1 Human Rights -- possessed by virtue of being people or moral agents
All engineers are entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as enumerated by the United Nations, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, gender, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, or other status.
Fundamental right to pursue legitimate personal interests and to make a living
Article 2 Employee Rights -- rights that apply or refer to the status of employees
a. Contractual -- arising solely out of an employee contract
To contractual and private terms of engagement
Of private practice, regardless of employment
Of total remuneration for professional services rendered
To receive a salary of a certain amount when employed
b. Noncontractual -- existing even if not formally recognized in a contract or company policy
To choose outside activities
To privacy and employer confidentiality
To due process from employer
To freedom from surveillance, psychological manipulation, and other job evaluation techniques
To practice regardless of health or physical fitness (where they do not obviously impair ability to perform professional service)
To reputational fairness based upon the notion that between an employer and each of its employees of long standing and unquestioned competence, an implicit moral compact exists under which each party is obliged to promote and protect the other’s major interests.
To not be arbitrarily discharged where the discharge would be inconsistent with the public good, even if his employment contract is terminable at will
Article 3 Professional Rights -- possessed by virtue of being professionals having special moral responsibilities
To be free from being subjected to threats, coercion, intimidation, harassment or other pressures which tend to influence their free exercise of moral and ethical decision making,
Of professional conscience (the right to exercise professional judgment in pursuing professional obligations)
To refuse to engage in unethical activity
To express one’s professional judgment, including the right to dissent
To warn the public of dangers
To fair recognition and remuneration for professional services
To refuse unethical activity without prejudice or loss of contract
To lifetime registration, barring proven misbehavior or incompetency
To national registration and freedom to practice
To exercise responsible professional judgment in pursuing professional responsibilities. Pursuing those responsibilities involves exercising both technical judgment and reasoned moral conviction.
To be an ethical engineer
To seek advice and guidance as necessary to resolve the employee's concern or question when faced with an unethical business conduct or a legal question
To protect the public safety, that an engineer's contract of employment includes as a matter of law, an implied term that such engineer will protect the public safety, and that a discharge of an engineer solely or in substantial part because he acted to protect the public safety constitutes a breach of such implied term
To engage in external whistle-blowing concerning safety when three conditions are met:
1. If the harm that will be done by the product to the public is serious and considerable;
2. If they make their concerns known to their superiors; and
3. If getting no satisfaction from their immediate superiors, they exhaust the channels available within the corporation, including going to the board of directors.
In order for the whistle-blowing to be morally obligatory, two further conditions must be met:
4. He [or she] must have documented evidence that would convince a reasonable, impartial observer that his [or her] view of the situation is correct and the company policy wrong.
5. There must be strong evidence that making the information public will in fact prevent the threatened serious harm.

Website: http://users.khbo.be/lodew/Universal%20Declaration%20of%20Engineers'%20Rights.htm




PHI 301: Engineering Ethics
Lecture Sheet 12: Technology and Globalization
Instructor: M. Jamal Hossain
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effects of Technological Developments on Globalization Process

Technological developments are conceived as the main facilitator and driving force of most of the globalization processes. Before elaborating on the consequences of several technological developments, we must go through the definition of technology as a sociological term, so that we can further explore the social and political role of technology in the globalization process.

Technology can be defined as the socialized knowledge of producing goods and services. We can describe the term technology with five important elements: production, knowledge, instruments, possession and change. Our definition of technology as a socialized knowledge can be better conceived with these elements. Now we shall briefly look through them:

It has something to do with production (of goods and services). We need technology to produce something either goods (ex: clothes, television set, cars etc.) or service (ex: banking, security, teaching etc.) Technology improves our capacity to produce.

Technology has something to do with knowledge. Technology is a result of intellectual activities.  Therefore technology is type of intellectual property. Today technology is developed through research and development institutions as integral parts of the universities.

Technology has something to do with instruments. The instruments are the extensions of the human body, whenever an instrument is used there is technology involved. The instruments indicate the usage of technology by human beings. Instruments are mostly physical such as computers, vacuum cleaners or pencils, but sometimes there are immaterial instruments too, such as databases or algorithms in computer programming.

Technology has something to do with possession. Those people who possess technology also control it. Controlling technology has usually something to do with economics and politics. Therefore we can speak of technologically rich and poor countries and the struggle among them usually in the forms of patents, transfers and protection of intellectual rights.

Technology has something to do with change. With technology, the world has changed drastically. Most of the innovations from the technological advances have very important effects on the lives of peoples of the world, which has witnessed radical changes especially after 1960’s revolutions on the microelectronics technologies. Even there are some people who argue that the history is made by technology as a result of their highly criticized techno-determinist view.

All these aspects of technology justify our definition of technology as the socialized knowledge of producing goods and services, and this definition makes a clear differentiation between the terms technology and technique (technics). Therefore if we speak about the effects of technology on globalization, instead of techniques or technical developments we refer to technology as a social and political term.

One may argue that the commercial activities on the Mediterranean in the Ancient times were to be labeled as globalization. The world of these ages, although smaller in size than that of today, had witnessed a simpler form of globalization, after the technological developments on navigation and transportation. The invention of the script can be considered as the first technology of communication that contributed to globalization. With the script man could transmit and store information that could speed up further technological developments. Transportation and communication in these ages were in parallel to each other and there were couriers, people who specifically carried and delivered mail and other written materials by running or riding horse. However this limited amount of information transmitted, received and stored was not sufficient for a large-scale state. Later, due to further developments in transportation and communication it was possible to control larger areas; and the emergence of larger empires such as Byzantine Empire had provided greater globalizations.  Invention of the print machine with moving letters by Gutenberg was the most important revolutionary technological development, which made possible even a larger global geography. The emergence of the newspapers marked an important era of globalization when the news both commercial and political became an indispensable element for the decision makers. Another milestone in the history of globalization is the invention of telegraph by Samuel Morse. Telegraph made it possible to communicate with the places where you don’t have to go and separated the practices of communication from those of transportation. This aspect of telegraph soon drew the attention of military ranks and telegraph became both a civilian and military communication technology. However because the poles and the copper wires needed for a telegraph and telephone system it was not possible to set up a properly functioning network in insecure and instable geographies. Cyrus Field’s attempts to lay a transatlantic cable for telegraphy succeeded in 1858 and this marked the beginning of a global network. Telephone of Graham Bell in 1861 also contributed to communication networks. Railways also networked to reach to larger distances. Invention of radio as a wireless communication technology solved this problem and opened a new era of globalization. With radio it became possible to communicate with places where you cannot go and even with places where no one can travel. Hertz, Maxwell, Marconi, Tesla and several other people contributed to the invention of radio, which soon became a military communication tool especially for the navy. Radio of 1920’s however, turned to be a commercial communication technology; and is used as a mass communication technology. Transportation technologies also improved with the start of the 20th Century when transatlantic ships became safer and faster and airplanes were produced. First propeller driven passenger plane began service in 1919 between London and Paris. Jet plane and television of 1950’s were also important steps toward greater globalizations. The first reliable transatlantic telephone cable TAT-1 was laid in 1956. 1957 marked the most important step in the history of globalization when USSR launched its Sputnik as the first man-made satellite. Satellites made it possible to built a fully reliable global network, compensating the radio networks’ ionosphere fading problem. However global networks still required stronger global networks with solid connections. The first transatlantic fiber cable TAT-8 was laid in 1988 for faster and reliable networks.

Global networks:

Digital technologies have opened the way towards global networks. Global networks are the networks in which all information and knowledge – also the ideology- necessary for the realization, maintenance and the reproduction of the system – basically the capitalist system. The term “New Economy” is the clearest explanation of how all these information, knowledge and ideology are in close relation to capitalism.

Monopolization of economic power –or rather the emergence of an oligopoly markets- is also related to the technology, which facilitates the monopoly tendencies in many ways. Electronic banking is at the heart of the global networks system. Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT), is the first operating form of global electronic financial networks. With EFT it is possible to send and receive financial assets among banks. The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is the organization to assure a reliable global electronic financial system.

In 1973 in Brussels, supported by 239 banks in 15 countries, SWIFT starts the mission of creating a shared worldwide data processing and communications link and a common language for international financial transactions. In 1977, Albert, Prince of Belgium, sends the first SWIFT message. By this time the initial group of members has grown to 518 commercial banks in 17 countries. By the end of that year SWIFT achieved 518 customers - 22 countries - 3,400,000 messages. In 1985 a satellite link between US and Europe established. With the utilization of sattelite technology SWIFT has developed rapidly and this technologically well functioning electronic financial network has been accepted globally. By the end of 1999 SWIFT had 6,797 live users in 189 countries and reached 1,059,000,000 messages.

With the introduction of VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal) technology utilizing the satellites, it has been possible to establish communication networks for TNCs themselves. These networks have been re-structured later with the introduction of IP based intranet technologies. Today it is easily possible to establish a perfectly functioning intranet of a TNC with branches over distant parts of the globe.

The satellites today lie at the heart of the global networks. The foundation of INTELSAT in 1964, as an international organization for satellite utilization, was an important step towards the handling of several techno-political issues such as scarce resource satellite positions on Clark belt, an imaginary line 35780 km. Above the equator. The foundation of INTERSPUTNIK in 1971 by the Soviet allies, also improved the communication capabilities of many non-Western countries. The foundation of EUTELSAT in 1974 was another response by the European countries in the “space race”. Today Turkey has three satellites positioned at 42 degrees East and 31.3 degrees East.

Internet and especially e-commerce are the terms that are basically used for justifying the recent approach of techno-globalism. Techno-globalism can be summarized as the ideology which rationalizes globalism on technological grounds. 

The techno-globalists, most of them live in the Anglo-Saxon countries claim that technology makes globalism irresistible. Therefore, techno-globalists wishing to dismantle all worldwide barriers to economic or technology flows, suggest a “liberal” global economic system on technologically improved infrastructure.



Lecture sheet 11: Job Discrimination

Job Discrimination is done under some mechanisms. They are:
  1. Minorities or ethnicities
  2. Gender Discrimination
  3. Racial Discrimination
  4. Low wages and sexual harassment

Affirmative Action





Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
I

INTRODUCTION

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, political and social concepts referring to guarantees of freedom, justice, and equality that a state may make to its citizens. Although the terms have no precise meaning in law and are sometimes used interchangeably, distinctions may be made. Civil rights is used to imply that the state has a positive role in ensuring all citizens equal protection under law and equal opportunity to exercise the privileges of citizenship and otherwise to participate fully in national life, regardless of race, religion, sex, or other characteristics unrelated to the worth of the individual. Civil liberties is used to refer to guarantees of freedom of speech, press, or religion; to due process of law; and to other limitations on the power of the state to restrain or dictate the actions of individuals. The two concepts of equality and liberty are overlapping and interacting; equality implies the ordering of liberty within society so that the freedom of one person does not infringe on the rights of others, just as liberty implies the right to act in ways permitted to others.
II

HISTORY
The concept that human beings have inalienable rights and liberties that cannot justly be violated by others or by the state is linked to the history of democracy. It was first expressed by the philosophers of ancient Greece. Socrates, for example, chose to die rather than renounce the right to speak his mind in the search for wisdom. Somewhat later the Stoic philosophers formulated explicitly the doctrine of the rights of the individual (see Stoicism). Traces of libertarian doctrine appear in the Bible and in the writings of the Roman statesman Marcus Cicero and the Greek essayist Plutarch. Such ideas, however, did not gain a permanent place in the political structure of the Roman Empire and all but disappeared during medieval times.
A

Early Development
Individual freedom can survive only under a system of law by which both the sovereign and the governed are bound. Such a system of fundamental laws, whether written or embodied in tradition, is known as a constitution. The idea of government limited by law received effective expression for the first time in the Magna Carta (1215), which checked the power of the English king. The Magna Carta did not stem from democratic or egalitarian beliefs; rather, it was a treaty between king and nobility that defined their relationship and laid the basis for the concept that the ruler was subject to the law rather than above it. The development of constitutional government was slowed by the persistence of the ideas of absolutism, the belief that all political power should be in the hands of one individual, and divine right, which held that kings derived their power from—and were accountable only to—God. These beliefs were widely held throughout Europe until the 18th century. The notion that the people have the right to be asked to consent to acts of government did not arrive without a protracted struggle. The reigns of the Tudor and Stuart monarchs in England were marked by fierce conflicts between the Crown and Parliament.
On the European continent the struggle between authoritarian and libertarian principles developed around religious rather than secular issues. During the Reformation, freedom of religious belief and practice was a primary concern. Tolerance was rare; as late as 1612, for instance, members of the Unitarian sect were burned as heretics in England (see Unitarianism). Not until the end of the 18th century did the ideals of religious toleration become firmly established in Western civilization.
As a result of the English, American, and French revolutions, libertarian ideals were embodied in the structure of national governments. In England, the struggle between Parliament and the absolutist Stuart monarchs culminated in the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688. King James II was expelled, and the new king, William III, gave royal assent (1689) to the Declaration of Rights (English Bill of Rights), which guaranteed constitutional government. Subsequently, the monarch’s prerogatives were limited by statute and custom. The idea of a constitutional system is described in the writings of the English philosopher John Locke, which profoundly influenced the leaders of the American colonies.
The 17th century was marked also by the growth of individual freedom in Great Britain. In the common law courts, for example, the judges became more concerned for the rights of those accused of crime, and procedural safeguards were established.
B

Spread of Civil Liberties
British colonists brought the concepts of limited government and individual freedom to the New World. The early laws of Virginia, Massachusetts, and other colonies reflected interest in the reform of criminal procedure that was emerging in Great Britain. A notable event in the history of civil liberties was the successful defense (1735) in New York by the Philadelphia lawyer Andrew Hamilton of the printer John Peter Zenger, who had been charged with seditious libel for criticisms of the colonial government in his publication the New York Weekly Journal. Hamilton established the principle that the government may not punish truthful publications of matters of public concern. See The Trial of John Peter Zenger.
The events leading to the American and French revolutions inspired writings that laid the foundations for modern ideas of civil liberties by such authors as the French philosophers Voltaire and Jean Jacques Rousseau, the British reformer John Wilkes and the philosopher Jeremy Bentham, the Anglo-American writer Thomas Paine, and the American statesmen Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in France and the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States formally established libertarian principles as a foundation of modern democracy.
Although civil liberties are often considered an integral part of democratic government, the principles of limited government and personal freedom were developed in England at a time when political power was held by an aristocratic upper class. Similarly, in the American colonies, many founding fathers did not favor democracy in the modern sense. Indeed, the framers of the U.S. Constitution provided a method of electing the nation’s president that avoids a direct popular vote. Conversely, history offers numerous examples of countries in which political power is formally vested in representative assemblies, but enforcement of law is arbitrary or despotic, and minorities have few safeguards against the tyranny of majorities.
III

CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE UNITED STATES
A

Religious Freedom

Although religious freedom has not generally been curtailed in the United States, Roman Catholics, Jews, and members of such unconventional Protestant groups as the Oneida Community and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have historically been discriminated against and sometimes have even been persecuted, although today overt discrimination has almost vanished.
The federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as many state and local laws, prohibits religious discrimination. The government recognizes the right of religious pacifists to refuse to bear arms, even in time of war. The Supreme Court has ruled that this right, known as conscientious objection, need not be based only on religious training or belief in a supreme being. The Court has also upheld the right of Jehovah’s Witnesses to refuse to salute the flag because of religious objections.
Applying the principle of separation of church and state (see Church and State), the Court has struck down many attempts to use public funds to finance religious schools; at times, however, the Court has permitted the use of public funds for buildings and other nonsectarian programs of religious schools. In the 1960s the Court ruled that state-composed prayers and Bible reading in public schools violated the Constitution, a policy to which the Court has adhered. In 2000, for example, it struck down school-sponsored prayers at public high school football games. Efforts to reverse these rulings were unsuccessful, but in recent years the Court has been more permissive in allowing government aid to religion. For example, in certain cases it has upheld a community’s right to place religious displays on public property, and in 2002 it upheld a school voucher program in which public funds were largely to pay for education at religious private schools. At the same time, however, the Court has refused to require the government to carve out religious exemptions from generally applicable laws.
B

Freedom of Speech, Press, and Assembly
Civil liberties have been most endangered during periods of national emergency. In 1798 hostility toward revolutionary France led Congress to enact the Alien and Sedition Acts, which stripped aliens of nearly all civil rights and threatened freedom of speech and the press by prohibiting “false, scandalous and malicious writing” against the government, Congress, or the president. The constitutionality of these acts was never tested, but they soon expired, were not reenacted, and are now generally agreed to have been unconstitutional.
During the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln gave his principal military officers wide and unreviewed authority to arrest civilians for disloyal speech or acts. After World War I, fear of the newly established Communist government in the Soviet Union led to the harassment of suspected subversives by the U.S. Department of Justice.
The rise of National Socialism in Germany, the spread of communism, and the Great Depression of the 1930s all combined to arouse concern for the internal security of the United States. The federal legislative and executive power to deal with disloyal acts was enlarged. In 1940 Congress passed the Smith Act, which outlawed the advocacy of force and violence as a means of bringing about changes in government. In 1950 Congress adopted the Internal Security Act, which established a new federal agency for identifying and suppressing so-called subversive persons and organizations. Congress virtually outlawed the Communist Party in 1954, although membership in the party was not expressly made criminal. These statutes were upheld by the Supreme Court, but eventually were limited in scope and fell into disuse during the 1960s. In 1969 the Court adopted a constitutional standard that protects political speech unless “directed to inciting … imminent lawless action” and was likely to produce such action.
In the 1950s congressional and state investigating committees conducted widely publicized hearings at which thousands of individuals were questioned concerning their political activities and associations, if any, with the Communist Party. Among the legislators prominently identified with these investigations were Senators Patrick McCarran of Nevada and Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court subsequently limited such proceedings.
New problems emerged during the 1960s and 1970s. Demonstrations by opponents of racial discrimination and the Vietnam War, and government attempts to restrict these demonstrations, led the Supreme Court to specify where, when, and how cities and states may limit the use of streets, parks, and other public places for purposes of protest. At the same time, certain symbolic forms of expression were employed by the protesters, leading to court rulings upholding criminal punishment for the burning of draft cards but reversing convictions for the mutilation of the American flag as a form of expression. The Court held in 1989 and 1990 that neither the federal government nor the states could single out the burning of the American flag for criminal penalties.
The attempted publication in 1971 by the New York Times and the Washington Post of the so-called Pentagon Papers led to a major Supreme Court decision that prior restraints on publication of national security material could not be enjoined unless such material “will surely result in direct, immediate and irreparable damage to our nation or its people.” See Censorship.
In 1964 the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that, to give the press breathing room, even false statements about public officials are protected by the First Amendment unless uttered with “actual malice”; that is, with knowledge of their falsehood or with reckless disregard of the facts. Later cases refined this decision but left to the discretion of the states whether to allow defamation actions brought by persons who are neither public officials nor public figures.
The Supreme Court also elaborated its 1957 ruling that obscenity is not constitutionally protected speech. Determining the content of obscenity has been difficult; in 1973 it was defined as speech that, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, is patently offensive in depicting sexual conduct, and lacks serious literary, political, or scientific value. This vague definition has led to numerous lawsuits involving explicit sexual material. Conservative religious groups and some feminists have attempted to restrict the distribution of sexually explicit material that is not obscene. The movement achieved limited success, but civil libertarians have led efforts to combat this form of censorship. In 1997 the Court struck down a federal law that banned nonobscene but sexually explicit material on the Internet. The Court reasoned that Congress may not prohibit circulation to adults of constitutionally protected speech simply because children might see it.
One of the most controversial First Amendment cases of the late 1970s did not reach the Supreme Court. When a U.S. Nazi group sought to march in Skokie, Illinois, the home of many Jewish survivors of German concentration camps, emotions were aroused, and the city enacted laws designed to prevent the march. Both federal and state courts upheld the right of this Nazi group, which was represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, to express itself peaceably.
The Court has broadened constitutional protection for many other forms of speech, including commercial speech. In the 1990s, it struck down several attempts to ban advertising, including liquor advertising, said to be harmful.
C

Criminal Trials and Due Process of Law
Thousands of Supreme Court rulings have been concerned with the rights of persons accused of crimes. Defendants in state as well as federal criminal cases are assured that they cannot be imprisoned for an offense unless represented by a lawyer, or counsel; if a defendant is impoverished, such counsel must be supplied by the government. Defendants must be warned that they may not be questioned until counsel is provided, and defendants may not be convicted on the basis of confessions obtained by coercion. The Court also ruled that prosecutors may not exclude people from juries on grounds of race or sex.
The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination was the most controversial constitutional protection during the 1950s and 1960s, when it was invoked by, among others, individuals accused of subversive activities and participation in organized crime. The Court’s interpretation of the Fourth Amendment has also generated controversy; its provisions protecting the security of the person and of dwellings have been cited in disallowing convictions based on evidence obtained by the police illegally. The Court in the 1970s began to narrow its interpretation, a process that has continued into the 21st century as the public has come to favor crime-control measures over the rights of defendants. This climate of opinion has also led to more frequent use of capital punishment, although the Court has limited the crimes for which death may be the punishment. The Court has also prescribed procedures that must be followed before the death penalty may be given. At the same time, it has limited the right of prisoners to appeal their convictions on constitutional grounds.
Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon by international terrorists, President George W. Bush invoked his constitutional authority as commander-in-chief and signed a military order allowing the government to detain and conduct secret trials of noncitizens suspected of terrorism. The U.S. military proceeded to detain as “enemy combatants” hundreds of foreign nationals who were captured during hostilities in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The government held them indefinitely at the U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, without bringing criminal charges or allowing them legal counsel. The military also detained two American citizens as enemy combatants.
In 2004 the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of indefinite detentions of enemy combatants. In the case Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Court upheld the authority of the president of the United States to classify U.S. citizens as enemy combatants and to detain them without charges. However, the Court ruled that such detainees are entitled to challenge the government’s case against them before an impartial judge. In addition, detainees have the right to an attorney. In Rasul v. Bush, the Court ruled that foreign detainees held at Guantánamo Bay have the right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.
The issue of indefinite detention, however, was raised anew by the passage of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act in late 2004. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) objected to one provision in the new law that calls for automatic pretrial detention for terrorist suspects. The ACLU warned that the provision would increase the possibility of indefinite detention, noting that most of those held at Guantánamo Bay were still in custody nearly four years after their initial arrest.
D

Privacy
A constitutional right of privacy, drawn from the Bill of Rights provisions protecting the security of home and person, as well as freedom of association, was first recognized by the Supreme Court in 1965. In Griswold v. Connecticut the Court struck down a state law that prohibited the use of contraceptives by a married couple. The decision was later extended to protect the rights of single persons and, in the Roe v. Wade decision of 1973, the right of women to abort an unwanted pregnancy. In 1980, however, the Court refused to apply this ruling to require the federal government to bear the cost of abortions for women who could not afford them. Efforts to reverse Roe v. Wade judicially or by constitutional amendment were unsuccessful. A divided Supreme Court in 1992 reaffirmed the core holding of Roe while further limiting its scope.
Other test cases of rights of privacy during this period concerned wiretapping and eavesdropping on private conversations, widespread dissemination of personal information through computers, access to information in government files, and the use without consent of pictures and names of celebrities. Although the courts have given some protection to privacy, the limitations have been relatively minor. For example, the Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that Congress could prohibit states from selling personal information on state drivers’ licenses and motor-vehicle registration records. Additional protection has resulted from legislative enactments such as the federal Privacy Act of 1974 and various state statutes.
The Patriot Act, antiterrorism legislation passed in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, significantly expanded the federal government’s surveillance powers. Federal agents were given greater authority to wiretap telephones, to monitor e-mail and Internet use, and to secretly search a suspect’s home or office. These powers were further widened by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which authorized the sharing of personal information from public and private databases. Civil liberties advocates warned that this provision had the potential to lead to unchecked data surveillance, but supporters of the law said adequate safeguards were in place to protect privacy.
Civil liberties advocates were again concerned when it was revealed in December 2005 that President George W. Bush had signed a presidential order in 2002 authorizing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop without judicial warrants on the overseas electronic communications of U.S. citizens and foreign nationals in the United States. Many legal experts believed the order violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which set up a special court to hear government requests for domestic wiretaps of U.S. citizens or foreign nationals in investigations involving espionage. Although the Patriot Act further amended FISA by lowering the standard for court-approved eavesdropping to include possible terrorists linked to foreign intelligence services, it still required approval by the FISA special court for wiretapping. FISA was enacted in response to abuses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency, which were found to have wiretapped individuals and organizations engaged in civil rights and anti-Vietnam War protests and other First Amendment-protected activities during the 1960s and 1970s. To prevent abuses, FISA prohibited any electronic surveillance not authorized by the special court.
In hearings before the U.S. Congress, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales aggressively countered the claim that the NSA wiretapping was illegal, citing Bush’s authority as commander in chief. Gonzales said the program’s legality was also established by a congressional resolution, the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, that authorized the president to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to prevent future acts of terrorism. Many members of Congress, however, said the resolution had nothing to do with warrantless electronic surveillance. The conflict raised serious questions not only about privacy but also about the limits of presidential power and the system of checks and balances during wartime.
E

Minority Rights
E1

Civil Rights for Blacks
The most critical civil rights issue in the United States has concerned the status of its black minority. After the Civil War the former slaves’ status as free people entitled to the rights of citizenship was established by the 13th and 14th Amendments, ratified in 1865 and 1868, respectively. The 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibited race, color, or previous condition of servitude as grounds for denying or abridging the rights of citizens to vote. In addition to these constitutional provisions, Congress enacted several statutes defining civil rights more particularly. The Supreme Court, however, held several of these unconstitutional, including an 1875 act prohibiting racial discrimination by innkeepers, public transportation providers, and places of amusement.
During the period of Reconstruction the Republican-dominated federal government maintained troops in the southern states. Blacks voted and held political offices, including seats in Congress. Two blacks became senators, and 20 were elected to the House of Representatives during this era. The Reconstruction era aroused the bitter opposition of most southern whites. The period came to an end in 1877, when a political compromise between the Republican Party and southern leaders of the Democratic Party led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South.
In the last two decades of the 19th century, blacks in the South were disfranchised and stripped of other rights through discriminatory legislation and unlawful violence. Separate facilities for whites and blacks became a basic rule in southern society. In Plessy v. Ferguson, an 1896 case involving the segregation of railroad passengers, the Supreme Court held that “separate but equal” public facilities did not violate the Constitution and refused to acknowledge that the separate facilities in use were not in fact equal.
During the first half of the 20th century, racial exclusion, either overt or covert, was practiced in most areas of American life. During World War II (1939-1945) black leaders such as A. Philip Randolph protested segregation in military service, and some reforms were introduced. In 1948 President Harry S. Truman signed an executive order integrating the armed forces. The 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education represented a turning point; reversing the 1896 “separate but equal” ruling, the Court held that compulsory segregation in public schools denied black children equal protection under the law. It later directed, ineffectually, that desegregated educational facilities be furnished “with all deliberate speed.” Subsequent decisions outlawed racial exclusion or discrimination in all government facilities. The Court also upheld federal laws barring discrimination in interstate commerce, such as public transportation. A state law against racial intermarriage was also ruled invalid (see Miscegenation).
School desegregation was resisted in the South. Federal determination to enforce the court decision was demonstrated in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957, when President Dwight Eisenhower dispatched troops to secure admission of black students into a “white” high school. Nevertheless, in the Deep South progress toward integration was negligible in the years following the Supreme Court decision. In 1966, for example, the overwhelming majority of southern schools remained segregated. By 1974, however, some 44 percent of black students in the South attended integrated schools, and by the early 1980s the number was approximately 80 percent.
In the North and West many black students also attended segregated schools. Such segregation was considered unconstitutional only where it could be proven to have originated in unlawful state action. Public controversy, sometimes violent, continued over the issue of transporting children in school buses long distances from their homes in order to achieve integration. Busing had become necessary because of the concentration of minority populations in the central areas of many cities. The Supreme Court dealt a blow to such busing in July 1974 by, in effect, barring it across school-district lines except on a voluntary basis.
Civil rights for blacks became a major national political issue in the 1950s. The first federal civil rights law since the Reconstruction period was enacted in 1957. It called for the establishment of a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and authorized the U.S. attorney general to enforce voting rights. In 1960 this legislation was strengthened, and in 1964 a more sweeping civil rights bill outlawed racial discrimination in public accommodations and by employers, unions, and voting registrars. Deciding that normal judicial procedures were too slow in assuring minority registration and voting, Congress passed a voting rights bill in 1965. The law suspended (and amendments later banned) use of literacy or other voter-qualification tests that had sometimes served to keep blacks off voting lists, authorized appointment of federal voting examiners in areas not meeting certain voter-participation requirements, and provided for federal court suits to bar discriminatory poll taxes, which were ended by a Supreme Court decision and the 24th Amendment (ratified in 1964). In the aftermath of the assassination of the civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., Congress in 1968 prohibited racial discrimination in federally financed housing, but later efforts to strengthen the law failed.
E2

Affirmative Action
An important constitutional issue that has caused public controversy is whether, and to what degree, public and private institutions may use affirmative action to help members of minority groups obtain better employment or schooling. In the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case in 1978, the Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional for the University of California Medical School at Davis to set an absolute quota for the admission of minority candidates, but said that race can be taken into account for the setting of numerical goals that were not disguised quotas. The Court later ruled that racial preferences by a private corporation designed to remedy prior discrimination did not violate the Civil Rights Act.
A changing political climate in the 1980s and 1990s, however, led to the repeal of many affirmative action programs. In 1995 the Court said that all public affirmative action plans must be strictly scrutinized. The Court hinted strongly that only those plans designed to remedy past acts of discrimination would survive. Furthermore, many lower courts began to openly reject the finding in the Bakke case that colleges and universities were permitted to seek racial diversity among their student bodies by giving special consideration to minority applicants.
Nevertheless, in the first major decision on affirmative action since the Bakke case in 1978, the Supreme Court in 2003 reaffirmed racial diversity as a goal of college and university admissions programs. The case involved the University of Michigan Law School’s admission program, which considered race, among other qualities, in evaluating each applicant. In a 5 to 4 decision the Supreme Court upheld the law school’s affirmative action program, finding that there was a “compelling public interest” in achieving diversity as long as quotas were not used. The decision in Grutter v. Bollinger came despite briefs filed against affirmative action by the administration of President George W. Bush. The decision did not rescind state laws that forbid affirmative action programs, such as those passed by popular initiative in California and Washington. Civil rights organizations hailed the ruling as a historic victory. Opponents of the decision took note of the Court’s opinion that affirmative action should only be necessary for another 25 years.
F

Rights of Women
Historically, American women have been denied their civil rights in suffrage (they were unable to vote until a 1920 constitutional amendment), employment, and other areas. In the 1960s women organized to demand legal equality with men and, after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, made many gains, especially in employment. During the 1970s efforts continued to change not only unfair practices but also outmoded attitudes toward the role of women in society. In 1972 Congress passed the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the Constitution and submitted it to the states for ratification. The ERA, however, which was designed to eliminate legal discrimination against women, failed to win the approval of a sufficient number of states; by the June 1982 deadline only 35 of the required 38 states had ratified the amendment. Although the ERA failed, beginning in the 1970s the Supreme Court ruled that laws treating men and women differently were constitutionally suspect. In the landmark case United States v. Virginia in 1996, the Court said that sex discrimination is unconstitutional unless the state can advance an “exceedingly persuasive justification.”
Women have continued to make gains in certain trades and professions, including financial services, medicine, and law, but problems remain in many areas. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 extended to women victims of job bias the right to sue their employers for monetary damages. The act also established a commission to probe the “glass ceiling” that has prevented women and other minorities from advancing to top management. See Women’s Rights.
G

Rights of Other Minorities
The struggle for civil rights has not been confined to blacks, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, and women. Native Americans for decades were forcibly deprived of their lands and denied civil rights. In 1968 Congress enacted the Indian Civil Rights Act, and the federal courts have heard a number of suits designed to restore to Native American tribes rights to their ancestral lands.
The elderly have also been deprived of their civil rights, especially in employment and to some degree in housing. Federal and state laws have been only partially successful in solving this problem. Former prisoners and mental patients have suffered legal disabilities after their confinement ended, and resident aliens are sometimes denied equal employment opportunities.
Homosexuals, historically, have not had full civil rights because of social and sexual taboos. The number of judicial decisions and laws enacted at the local level to protect gay men and women from discrimination has increased, but the degree of prejudice was heightened in the 1980s by the concern about Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). In 1986 the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not bar criminal prosecution for private homosexual relations between consenting adults. Several local governments acted to curtail the rights of lesbians and gay men. By the early 1990s the gay community had organized more effectively than ever before in the effort to assert their rights. In 1996 the Supreme Court ruled that state and local governments cannot make it more difficult for homosexuals than other groups to seek protection through antidiscrimination legislation. And in 2003, in a landmark decision, the Supreme Court overturned its 1986 ruling and nullified laws in 13 states that criminalized gay sexual practices. The Court asserted that gays are “entitled to respect for their private lives” and that “the state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.”
iv

INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS
To establish the principles of civil liberties and civil rights on an international basis, the United Nations Charter was drawn up after World War II (1939-1945); it states that one of the purposes of the UN is to promote and encourage respect for “human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion.” In 1946 a UN Commission on Human Rights was established. In 1948 the General Assembly adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights prepared by the commission and embodying the 18th-century ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity. This declaration, however, is not binding on member states.
Almost all nations deny civil rights to disfavored minorities within their borders. A major obstacle to international protection of human rights is the opposition of most countries to interference with their internal affairs, including questions of the rights of their own citizens. To some degree this difficulty has been overcome through regional arrangements and implementing bodies such as the European Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
The administration of President Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s introduced human rights as an element of foreign policy. This initiative was unevenly pressed and sometimes ineffectual, but it increased international awareness of the gravity of the problem of securing human rights for all people. The administration of President Ronald Reagan took a less aggressive stance on human rights violations, claiming that quiet diplomacy was more effective than public threats. During the administrations of Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, human rights issues became increasingly intertwined with international trade and commercial treaties. Controversy surrounded the granting of most-favored-nation status to countries alleged to have violated human rights, such as China. Most-favored-nation status guarantees that a country will receive the same terms offered to other trade partners in commercial treaties.
International revulsion at atrocities committed in several countries during the 1990s, including Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, led to the establishment of international tribunals to try the most brutal war crimes. A permanent body, the International Criminal Court, began operation in 2002 to try individuals accused of war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. Proponents said the existence of the court would help deter future human rights abuses. The United States does not participate in the International Criminal Court and does not recognize its authority.

Sexual Harassment
I

INTRODUCTION
Sexual Harassment, a form of unlawful sex discrimination. Under federal law in the United States, sexual educational setting under certain conditions. Such behavior is illegal if it creates an environment that is harassment is unwanted verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature that occurs in the workplace or in an hostile or intimidating, if it interferes with a person’s work or school performance, or if acceptance of the harasser’s behavior is made a condition of employment or academic achievement. A number of other countries—including Japan, Canada, Australia, and several European nations—also have laws that prohibit sexual harassment.
Perceptions differ about what behaviors constitute sexual harassment. However, typical examples of sexual harassment include sexually oriented gestures, jokes, or remarks that are unwelcome; repeated and unwanted sexual advances; touching or other unwelcome bodily contact; and physical intimidation. Sexual harassment can occur when one person has power over another and uses it to coerce the person to accept unwanted sexual attention. If a supervisor forces an employee to have sex by threatening to fire the employee, that is sexual harassment. It can also occur among peers—for example, if coworkers repeatedly tell sexual jokes, post pornographic photos, or make unwelcome sexual innuendos to another coworker. Both men and women can be harassers or victims of sexual harassment. However, research indicates that women are more likely to be victims.
The Congress of the United States first prohibited discrimination based on an individual’s sex when it passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, it was not until the mid-1970s that U.S. courts began to interpret sexual harassment as a form of illegal sex discrimination. Since that time complaints of sexual harassment have become much more common. In several high-profile cases, prominent public officials have been accused of sexual harassment. These cases have increased public awareness of the issue and sparked debate concerning what types of behavior should be considered inappropriate or unlawful.
II

PREVALENCE
Many different studies have attempted to investigate the frequency and prevalence of sexual harassment. Surveys provide widely divergent statistics, indicating that anywhere from 30 to 70 percent of women have experienced some form of sexual harassment at some point in their lives. This wide range may be due in part to the fact that perceptions of what constitutes sexual harassment differ among individuals and among men and women. That is, what some people might consider acceptable behavior, others might think of as sexual harassment.
Another way of gauging the prevalence of sexual harassment is to examine formal complaints to government agencies. From 1990 to 1996 the number of complaints of sexual harassment in the workplace filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) more than doubled—from about 6000 to about 15,000. The number of men filing sexual harassment claims with the EEOC increased from 8 percent of all claims in 1990 to 10 percent of the total in 1996. Complaints of sexual harassment occurring at schools and colleges have also become more numerous.
Research indicates that sexual harassment is widespread among children and teenagers. One survey of more than 1500 students in nearly 80 junior high and high schools found that 85 percent of girls and 76 percent of boys had experienced some form of sexual harassment at school. The researchers in this study defined sexual harassment as unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior that interferes with a student’s life. In most categories, girls experienced higher rates of sexual harassment than did boys. Seventy-six percent of girls and 56 percent of boys reported being the target of sexual comments, jokes, gestures, or looks. This was the most common form of sexual harassment in the schools surveyed. Sixty-five percent of girls and 42 percent of boys reported that they had been touched, grabbed, or pinched in a sexual manner. Forty-two percent of girls and 34 percent of boys reported that they had been the subject of sexual rumors. However, more boys than girls (34 percent versus 31 percent) reported that others had shown, given, or left them sexual pictures, photographs, or messages.
Surveys about sexual harassment have a number of research limitations. Victims may be more likely than nonvictims to respond to a survey about sexual harassment. Alternatively, some victims may fail to report harassment because they are ashamed. Therefore, self-report surveys of victims or offenders may result in either overreporting or underreporting of harassment. Bearing in mind the limitations of the research, most experts agree that sexual harassment is widespread.
III

EFFECTS
Sexual harassment often has adverse effects on the victim’s performance at work or school. Both the quantity and the quality of work may suffer, as well as the employee’s or student’s morale, attendance, and ability to work with others. Sexual harassment can cause employers losses in productivity and can lead to greater employee turnover and use of sick leave. The harassment can also harm the victim’s psychological and physical well-being. One study found 96 percent of sexual harassment victims suffer from emotional distress, and 35 percent experience physical, stress-related problems. Typical symptoms include anger, fear, anxiety, lowered self-esteem, depression, guilt, humiliation, embarrassment, nausea, fatigue, headaches, and weight gain or loss.
Sexual harassment can also have indirect effects on society. Many feminist scholars consider sexual harassment to be a form of oppression that men use to maintain male-dominated power structures. These scholars note that sexual harassment in school limits girls’ participation and impairs their academic achievement. Similarly, women in fields of work that men have traditionally occupied—such as the military, law enforcement, and fire fighting—experience higher rates of sexual harassment. Some researchers assert that regardless of whether harassment is an intentional attempt to oppress girls and women, it contributes to lower achievement by women in society.
IV

LAWS AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT
In the United States, two major federal laws prohibit sexual harassment in employment and educational settings: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title IX of the Education Act of 1972. These laws authorize federal agencies to investigate complaints of sexual harassment. They also permit victims to file lawsuits against employers or schools seeking to end the harassment and to obtain monetary compensation for the harm resulting from it. Many states have also adopted laws prohibiting sexual harassment.
A

In the Workplace
Title VII prohibits sex discrimination by an employer with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. The EEOC, which enforces Title VII, has issued guidelines that help define what constitutes unlawful sexual harassment. According to these guidelines, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and verbal or physical sexual conduct constitute unlawful sexual harassment under any of three conditions: (1) submission to the conduct is either implicitly or explicitly made a term or condition of employment; (2) submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment decisions; or (3) the conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. The key element that makes the sexual behavior unlawful in each case is that it is unwanted by the recipient. For example, sexual jokes and flirting may be acceptable in the workplace under some circumstances; however, if these behaviors are unwelcome, they may constitute sexual harassment.
A person who believes he or she has experienced sexual harassment on the job has a limited period of time in which to file a complaint with the EEOC. After the EEOC investigates the matter, it issues a right to sue letter, regardless of its conclusions about the matter. The victim then has 90 days to file a lawsuit against the employer in federal court. If he or she is successful in the lawsuit, the victim can receive up to $300,000 in compensatory damages for each incident of unlawful harassment, as well as back pay, attorneys’ fees, and possibly additional money damages under state or local law. If the victim was fired or did not receive a promotion as a result of the harassment, the court may order reinstatement or promotion. The court may also order the harasser to discontinue the unlawful conduct.
B

In Schools
Title IX prohibits sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, in all federally funded educational institutions. The federal agency responsible for enforcing Title IX, the Office of Civil Rights of the Department of Education, has issued guidelines that help define the scope of that law with respect to sexual harassment. The guidelines discuss two types of sexual harassment. The first type involves a coercive tradeoff—for example, a threat by a professor to give a student a poor grade unless the student has sex with the professor. This type of harassment is known as quid pro quo, a Latin phrase meaning “this for that.” The second type of sexual harassment discussed by the guidelines involves unwanted sexual behavior that creates a hostile or intimidating environment.
A victim of sexual harassment in school can file a lawsuit against the school in federal court for monetary damages under Title IX. The victim need not complain to the Office of Civil Rights first. Educational institutions in violation of Title IX may also lose federal funding.
V

SUPREME COURT OPINIONS
The Supreme Court of the United States began hearing sexual harassment cases in the mid-1980s. Its first rulings described what behaviors constitute unlawful sexual harassment under the federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination. More recently, the Court has considered who is legally responsible when a victim proves that sexual harassment occurred.
A

Defining Sexual Harassment
In 1986 in the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the Supreme Court first recognized as unlawful both types of sexual harassment defined by the EEOC guidelines—that is, harassment involving a coercive tradeoff and harassment that creates a hostile or intimidating environment. The Court unanimously concluded that both types of sexual harassment were actionable under Title VII—meaning victims of such harassment could sue their employer for monetary damages.
In the Meritor case, a female employee alleged that the bank’s male vice president invited her to dinner and, afterward, suggested going to a motel to have sex. She testified that although she initially refused to go to the motel, she later agreed for fear of losing her job. The employee also alleged that the vice president repeatedly made sexual demands of her during business and nonbusiness hours, and that during the next few years they had sex approximately 40 to 50 times. The trial court had concluded that because the sexual relationship between the employee and her supervisor was voluntary, the sexual conduct was unrelated to the employee’s continued employment, and therefore the employee was not a victim of sexual harassment. The Supreme Court ruled that the employee might be able to show that the supervisor’s actions had illegally affected her employment conditions by creating a hostile and intimidating environment.
Whereas the trial court in the Meritor case focused on whether the employee suffered any tangible economic loss, the Supreme Court relied on the language of the EEOC guidelines regarding a hostile work environment. The Court compared sexual harassment to racial discrimination, stating: “Sexual harassment which creates a hostile or offensive environment for members of one sex is every bit the arbitrary barrier to sexual equality at the workplace that racial harassment is to racial equality.” The Court cautioned that to constitute harassment, the behaviors must be sufficiently severe and pervasive so as to “alter the conditions of [the victim’s] employment and create an abusive working environment.” It indicated that employees may sue for sexual harassment even if they did not resist the harassment or suffered no loss of tangible benefits. According to the Court, to determine whether unlawful sexual harassment has occurred, trial courts should assess whether the victim indicated that the sexual advances were unwelcome, and not whether the victim’s participation was voluntary.
In 1993 the Supreme Court again addressed a case in which an employee claimed that her supervisor had sexually harassed her by creating a hostile working environment. In Harris v. Forklift Systems, a female employee alleged that her male supervisor, in front of fellow employees, insulted her because she was a woman, made unwelcome sexual innuendoes, and asked her and other female employees to remove coins from his front pants pocket. The trial court concluded that although some of the supervisor’s comments offended the employee and would offend a reasonable woman, they were not severe enough to affect the employee’s psychological well-being, to interfere with her work performance, or to create an abusive or intimidating work environment. The trial court therefore dismissed the case.
The Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s decision and held that conduct need not “seriously affect an employee’s psychological well-being or cause the employee to suffer injury” in order to be actionable under Title VII. So long as a reasonable person could perceive the environment to be hostile or abusive, and the victim actually perceives it as such, it need not also be psychologically damaging. The Court acknowledged that the law did not provide a precise test for determining whether behavior constituted sexual harassment. The Court indicated that judges or juries should determine whether an environment is hostile by looking at all of the circumstances, based on a number of factors. These factors include the frequency and severity of the harassing conduct; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating; and whether it interferes with an employee’s work performance. According to the Court, the proper standard for determining sexual harassment is a middle path between conduct that is merely offensive and conduct that causes a tangible psychological injury.
In 1998 the Supreme Court, in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, ruled that unlawful sexual harassment could occur between members of the same sex. The Court did not examine the specifics of the employee’s complaint on appeal because the trial court had ruled summarily (without any trial to examine the facts) that the employee had no basis for a lawsuit under Title VII. Instead, the Court simply determined that the trial court erred in automatically dismissing the case. The Court’s decision also reiterated the standard expressed in the Harris case, which requires courts to assess alleged harassment from the perspective of a reasonable person considering all the circumstances.
B

Responsibility for Sexual Harassment
The Supreme Court has decided several cases regarding when employers and educational institutions are legally responsible (liable) for sexual harassment by employees. An employer or educational institution that is deemed liable must pay monetary damages to the victim of sexual harassment.
In its 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the Court refused to issue a definitive rule on employer liability under Title VII. However, the Court noted that the general principles of agency should govern responsibility for sexual harassment. Under these principles, employers can be liable for certain wrongdoings by their supervisory employees (agents) because of the legal relationship between the two parties. For example, employers are liable for harm caused by their supervisory employees if the employee's role as a supervisor helped him or her carry out the harmful actions. Applying these principles, lower courts have generally found employers liable for sexual harassment when managers took tangible, job-related action—such as unwarranted termination or demotion—against employees who refused their sexual advances.
In 1998 the Supreme Court issued a pair of decisions that clarified employer liability when supervisory employees sexually harass subordinates by creating a hostile work environment but do not take specific job-related actions against the victims. In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, the Court ruled that employers are potentially liable for sexual harassment by supervisory employees even if the victim did not experience 'tangible retaliation' or was not denied tangible job benefits. In the Ellerth case a female salesperson alleged that she had been continually harassed by a male supervisor. Ellerth testified that the supervisor touched her inappropriately and indicated that he could make her life 'very hard or very easy' at the company depending on whether she 'loosened up' sexually. However, she did not suffer any tangible job detriment (other than the hostile working environment) when she did not accept his advances. In Faragher, a female lifeguard claimed that she was subjected to ongoing and pervasive crude remarks and unwanted touching. However, she also testified that her male supervisors made no specific sexual demands.
In deciding that employers may still be liable for such harassment, the Court reasoned that an employee's supervisory status may help him or her to sexually harass a subordinate, even if the supervisor does not use his or her authority to take specific retaliatory actions against a victim. However, the Court also stated that employers may defend against such liability by showing that they 'exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly' any improper behavior. The Court indicated that an employer's failure to adopt an antiharassment policy and effectively communicate it to employees may demonstrate a lack of reasonable care. To avoid liability, employers must also demonstrate that the victim 'unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer.' For example, a victim's failure to formally report the harassment to company officials could be considered unreasonable in some cases. However, the Court noted that a victim's failure to report harassment might be reasonable if the employer's policy did not guarantee that the victim could register a complaint without the harassing supervisor's knowledge.
The Supreme Court has not addressed employer liability for sexual harassment among coworkers. Federal guidelines indicate that employers would be responsible for such sexual harassment if the employer knew or should have known of the conduct, unless the employer can show that it took immediate corrective action.
In a third 1998 decision, Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, the Court narrowly defined the liability of school districts for sexual harassment of students by teachers. The Court rejected the plaintiff's argument that the liability of school districts under Title IX should be the same as employer liability under Title VII. In other words, the plaintiff asserted that if the authority of the teacher helped him or her to sexually harass a student, the school district should be liable. Instead, the Court ruled that a student who is sexually harassed by a teacher may only recover damages from a school district if an official with authority over the teacher knew about the misconduct and was “deliberately indifferent' to it.
In 1999 the Court ruled that institutions covered by Title IX may also be financially liable for sexual harassment of students by other students, sometimes referred to as peer harassment. In Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, the Court ruled that victims of peer harassment are entitled to monetary damages from the school only if a school official was aware of the misconduct and, showing deliberate indifference, failed to take proper remedial action. The Court also indicated that in order to receive damages, the victim must demonstrate that the harassment was “so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive' that it effectively denied the victim access to educational opportunities or benefits provided by the school.
VI

FREEDOM-OF-SPEECH ISSUES
In an attempt to eliminate sexual harassment and avoid financial liability, many employers have developed company policies expressly prohibiting sexual harassment and providing reporting procedures for victims. Often these policies regulate speech in an attempt to prevent verbal harassment. Many schools have adopted similar policies, and some colleges have enacted so-called hate speech codes, which prohibit the use of certain language, such as racist and sexist comments. These policies and codes may conflict with freedom of speech, a right guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
The U.S. Supreme Court has not yet directly addressed the potential conflict between the First Amendment and policies designed to prevent sexual harassment. However, one ruling by the Supreme Court indicates some restriction of speech to prevent sexual harassment may be permissible. In R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) the Court invalidated a city ordinance prohibiting hate speech based on race and gender. Although the focus of the R.A.V. case was racially motivated speech and not sexual harassment, the Court suggested in passing that policies designed to prevent sexual harassment could be lawful if the policies are primarily directed at conduct rather than speech.
In Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards (1991), a lower federal court examined the potential conflict between constitutionally protected freedom of speech and prohibited sexual harassment. In the Robinson case, female employees alleged that male coworkers created a hostile and intimidating environment by posting in the workplace numerous pictures of nude women and making sexually derogatory comments. The employees accused of harassment countered that they were exercising their right of free speech. Finding in favor of the female employees, the court concluded that the governmental interest in eliminating discrimination outweighed the harassers’ alleged free speech rights. Because each allegation of sexual harassment is assessed based on the specific circumstances of the case, other courts have concluded that no harassment takes place when employees read pornographic magazines or tell jokes involving sexual innuendo.
VII

ATTITUDES TOWARD SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Prior to the mid-1970s courts in the United States responded to allegations of sexual harassment by concluding that it was a “private matter.” This approach paralleled the early judicial response to racial discrimination in society. It was not until women gained legal protection of their civil rights, joined the workforce in greater numbers, and attained positions of authority that attitudes toward sexual harassment shifted. Eventually, the courts began to recognize sexual harassment as unlawful discrimination and to provide legal remedies. Throughout the 1980s increased numbers of employees—the majority of whom were women—filed lawsuits alleging employers should be held responsible for sexual harassment engaged in by their employees.
During the 1990s several high-profile incidents focused public attention on the legal and social issues surrounding sexual harassment. For example, in 1991 U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas was accused of sexual harassment by Anita Hill, then a law school professor. During the confirmation proceedings, Hill alleged that Thomas engaged in sexual misconduct while she had worked for him at two federal agencies in the 1980s. Thomas denied the allegations, and the U.S. Senate ultimately confirmed his nomination by a vote of 52-48. However, the nationally televised hearings brought unprecedented attention to the issue of sexual harassment. In addition, the incident spawned public debate concerning the treatment of those who allege sexual harassment and the safeguards for those accused of committing it.
Also in 1991, several female officers in the United States Navy announced that they had been sexually harassed during the Tailhook Convention, an annual convention of navy aviators. More than 25 women, nearly half of whom were officers, alleged that drunken male pilots grabbed them, bit them, and tried to remove their clothes as the pilots pushed them down a hotel hallway. As a result of these accusations, information surfaced about other sexual misconduct at prior conventions and throughout the Navy. Furthermore, the episode increased public awareness of sexual harassment in all branches of the military. Despite official proclamations of “zero tolerance” for sexual harassment following the Tailhook incident, in 1995 the U.S. Department of Defense released a study indicating that 52 percent of women and 9 percent of men in the military had experienced what they considered to be sexual harassment.
Accusations of sexual harassment occurred at the highest levels of political power in the 1990s. Beginning in 1992 several dozen women accused U.S. Senator Robert Packwood of making unwelcome and aggressive sexual advances. He resigned in 1995 after the Senate Ethics Committee voted to expel him on charges of sexual misconduct. In 1994 Paula Jones, a former employee of the State of Arkansas, filed a civil lawsuit alleging that she was sexually harassed by U.S. President Bill Clinton while he served as governor of Arkansas. In 1998 a judge dismissed the suit after determining that even if Jones’s allegations were proven, she could not demonstrate that she had been harmed by the behavior. Jones appealed the dismissal but later agreed to a financial settlement from Clinton and dropped the case.